The ARC 2010 journal rankings are now out. Once again our research has been re-classified retrospectively. Once again, competition law journals fair poorly. We have two more competition law journals classified as ‘A’, journals’, but both are foreign, with the result that there are now five foreign competition/business law journals with an A ranking and no local journals. No competition law journals anywhere reach the A+ ranking. Some have completely disappeared from the list. For last year’s list see my earlier blog. Here are the current rankings with changes noted. (Australian journals appear in green; the list of business journals is not comprehensive):
A+
Nope, nothing here …
A
American Business Law Journal
Antitrust Law Journal
European Competition Law Review (up from a B last year)
Journal Of Business Law
World Competition: Law and Economics Review (up from a B last year)
B
Australian Business Law Review
Competition and Consumer Law Journal
International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law
Journal of Competition Law and Economics
C
(the vast majority of all journals are here)
Antitrust Bulletin
Business Law Review
Business Lawyer
Competition Law Journal
European Business Law Review
European Competition Journal
International Business Lawyer
No ranking
These ones seem to have dropped off the list – I can’t find them anyway!
Antitrust
Antitrust Law and Economics Review
Australian and New Zealand Trade Practices Law Bulletin
Competition Law Review
Global Competition Review
International Business Law Journal
Trade Practices Law Journal (this must be a mistake – I am exploring further!)
————–
Re-ranking is both necessary and problematic. As researchers, our immediate status as ‘research active’ or not is determined by the ranking system and our research ‘quality’ is also now judged by the quality ranking assigned to the journals in which we publish. There are many problems with this – esp where the rankings are not static and the discipline areas not fairly represented – in particular, there is a very odd emphasis on publishing in foreign journals (which often means publishing about foreign law rather than concentrating research on our own; this is more of a problem in law which has many jurisdiction-specific quirks than many other areas). I previously written about my feelings regarding the current ranking system. They have not changed (at least not for the better) following this re-ranking.
FYI, the generalist law journals rankings I’ve previously mentioned remain essentially the same, save that the Australian Law Journal has moved from C to B ranking and the Griffith Law Review has had a miraculous jump from a B ranking to an A+ ranking.
For me, I will start focusing more on comparative law with emphasis on US and European jurisdictions rather than focusing on some of the real problems we have with our own domestic competition laws …